High Volatility & Earnings

July 27, 2026

High Volatility & Earnings

Market recap

*Analyzing the markets with Richie Naso, a Wall Street veteran of over 40 years and former member of the NYSE.

Weekly Market Performance

Index / ETF 52-Week YTD Weekly
DJIA +15.69% +8.08% −0.38%
S&P 500 +16.02% +8.28% −0.61%
NASDAQ +18.32% +7.46% −2.13%
Alphabet (GOOGL) +65.51% +2.15% −7.79%

Source: Barron’s Market Dashboard, print edition, July 27, 2026.

Small caps & credit

Russell 2000: Rotation Away From Higher-Beta Names

The Russell 2000 declined approximately 1.1% this week, underperforming the Dow Jones Industrial Average but outperforming the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite. The index ended Friday at 2,930.00, as investors rotated away from higher-beta small-cap stocks amid rising Treasury yields, higher oil prices, and increased geopolitical uncertainty.

HYG: Credit Markets Stay Calm

The iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) finished the week essentially unchanged, closing at approximately $79.23 and continuing to trade near the middle of its 52-week range. Despite increased volatility in the equity markets, high-yield credit remained remarkably resilient, suggesting institutional investors have not materially reduced exposure to corporate credit risk.

Throughout the week, HYG showed little evidence of the type of selling pressure that typically accompanies a broad “risk-off” environment. Credit spreads remained relatively stable, and the ETF continued to benefit from healthy demand for below-investment-grade corporate bonds. This is an encouraging signal for equities, because high-yield bonds often reflect institutional investors’ confidence in economic growth and corporate balance sheets before the stock market does.

Why it matters for stocks:

  • When HYG is strong, it suggests investors are comfortable taking risk and credit markets remain supportive of equities.
  • When HYG weakens, it often signals growing concern about:
    ○ economic growth,
    ○ rising default risk,
    ○ tighter financial conditions,
    ○ or declining liquidity.

Market structure

From “Risk On / Risk Off” to “AI On / AI Off”

A piece in this week’s Barron’s by Alex Rosenberg makes an argument worth every trader’s attention: the old “risk on / risk off” framework no longer describes how this market trades. In its place, sentiment toward artificial intelligence has become the dominant driver — call it “AI on / AI off.”

Two data points from the article stand out. Rocky Fishman of Asym Research finds that five of the S&P 500’s eleven sectors — including healthcare and real estate — have shown zero or negative correlation with the index over the past five months. And Jonathan Krinsky of BTIG notes that the average S&P 500 stock has moved opposite the index on 52 of 135 trading days this year, versus 24 in the comparable stretch of 2025 and never more than 15 in any year of the 2010s. Dispersion beneath the surface is historically extreme, which is why the index can look quiet on days that feel anything but.

The mechanics are straightforward: five AI heavyweights — Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta — represent roughly a quarter of the S&P 500, so daily shifts in AI sentiment now move the whole tape. Rosenberg points to late June’s sharp chip-stock selloff, which came on little news while beaten-down software names rallied — less a classic rotation than an “AI-off” day in an “AI-on” year.

The article also flags the open question hanging over the trade: Barclays survey data shows more American adults using AI personally than at work, with daily workplace use under 14% and essentially flat for two years. Barclays reads that as an economy still early in the adoption cycle; skeptics read it as evidence that measurable productivity gains haven’t yet followed the spending. How that question resolves will matter enormously for a market this concentrated in AI names.

This week's interesting sector piece

Income Investing: Banks vs. REITs

Also in Barron’s this week, Ian Salisbury compares the two classic income sectors — banks and REITs — and makes the case that banks currently offer the more attractive total-return setup, even with lower headline yields (banks around 1.9% versus roughly 3.1% for real estate, against about 1% for the S&P 500).

The argument, in brief: both sectors are rate-sensitive and both struggled after the Fed began hiking in 2022, but their paths have diverged. Banks — short-term borrowers and long-term lenders — have benefited from the steepening yield curve, a strong economy, and robust investment-banking activity. FactSet consensus cited in the piece has financial-sector profits growing nearly 18% in Q2 versus under 6% for real estate. After 32 large banks passed the Fed’s June stress test, names including JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, PNC, and Regions announced sizable dividend increases and buybacks.

Salisbury highlights UBS’s “shareholder yield” framing — dividends plus buybacks — under which financials return close to 5% of market value to shareholders annually versus under 3% for REITs. UBS strategists led by Keith Parker expect regulatory and earnings tailwinds to keep supporting payouts across banks, investment banks, and consumer finance. The article mentions several vehicles investors use for exposure, including bank-sector ETFs and preferred securities yielding 5–7%. REITs, by contrast, remain in a halting recovery: the article cites a soft single-family rental market, Sunbelt oversupply, and a spotty office sector, with the brighter spots — data-center and senior-housing REITs — trading at low yields and high multiples.

As always, this is a summary of third-party analysis, not a recommendation. Analyst forecasts and sector views are the authors’ own and are not a guarantee of future performance.

On my radar this week

Key Events and Data Points to Monitor

The items below reflect Richard Naso’s personal areas of focus for the coming week and are provided for informational and educational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to trade any security.

WATCH LIST — WEEK OF JULY 27, 2026

▸Earnings — The Main Event

Roughly 160 S&P 500 companies report this week, including four of the Magnificent Seven: Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Apple

▸Federal Reserve Commentary

Fed remarks alongside a heavy earnings calendar could amplify swings in either direction

▸Treasury Yields

Rising yields pressured small caps this week; continued strength would keep higher-beta names on the defensive

▸HYG — Credit Market Signal

High-yield credit has stayed resilient through the equity volatility; a break lower would be an early warning sign

Technical outlook

At a Near-Term Inflection Point

The major indexes remain in longer-term uptrends, but several are testing important intermediate-term support following recent profit-taking. The market appears to be at a near-term inflection point, where earnings and guidance will likely determine whether buyers regain control.

Final Thoughts

Richie’s Take

This is likely to be a high-volatility week, driven primarily by earnings, Federal Reserve commentary, and Treasury yields. While recent weakness has been concentrated in technology, the resilience of credit markets and continued strength in financials suggest the broader bull market remains intact.

The market is transitioning from one driven by expanding valuations to one that will increasingly depend on earnings growth and corporate guidance. If companies continue to deliver solid results and management teams remain optimistic about the second half of the year, pullbacks may prove to be opportunities rather than reasons to abandon the longer-term bullish trend.

Remain disciplined, monitor HYG and Treasury yields closely, and let the market’s reaction to earnings — not the headlines — guide your decisions.

— Richie

Disclosure

This content (“Content”) is produced by Richard Naso. The Content represents only the views and opinions of Mr. Naso, who is compensated by TradeZero for producing it. Mr. Naso’s trading experiences and accomplishments are unique, and your trading results may vary substantially from his. TradeZero does not endorse the Content and makes no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy of the Content or information available through any referenced or linked third-party sites. The Content has been made available for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice or a recommendation as to any security.

Past performance referenced in this Content is not indicative of future results.

Trading securities can involve high risk and the potential loss of funds. Trading on margin is for experienced investors and traders only, as the amount you may lose can be greater than your initial investment. Short selling as a securities trading strategy is extremely risky and can lead to potentially unlimited losses. Options trading is not suitable for all investors as it can involve risk that may expose investors to significant losses. Please read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options (the Options Disclosure Document, or ODD) at theocc.com/Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/Options-Disclosure-Document before deciding to engage in options trading.

TradeZero provides self-directed brokerage accounts to customers through its operating affiliates: TradeZero America, Inc., a United States broker-dealer, registered with the SEC and member of FINRA and SIPC; TradeZero, Inc., a Bahamian broker-dealer registered with the Securities Commission of the Bahamas; TradeZero Canada Securities ULC, a Canadian broker-dealer, member of CIRO and CIPF; and TradeZero Europe B.V., a Dutch broker-dealer authorized and regulated by the AFM under MiFID II (collectively, the “TradeZero Broker Dealers”).